logo
Ana sayfa Davalar

Case Study: Why a Chemical Processing Plant Switched from RB-SiC to SSiC

Sertifika
Çin Shaanxi KeGu New Material Technology Co., Ltd Sertifikalar
Çin Shaanxi KeGu New Material Technology Co., Ltd Sertifikalar
Müşteri yorumları
NGK, Shaanxi Kegu ile uzun süredir süren ortaklığımıza değer veriyor. Onların SSiC seramikleri kalite ve yenilikçiliğiyle öne çıkıyor, karşılıklı başarımızı yönlendiriyor.

—— NGK Thermal Technology Co., Ltd.

Huike'de, Shaanxi Kegu Yeni Malzeme Teknolojisi Şirketi'yle uzun süredir süren ortaklığımızla gurur duyuyoruz. Güven, yenilik ve ortak mükemmellik üzerine kurulan bir işbirliği.SSiC seramiklerinde uzmanlıkları ve güvenilir çözümleri projelerimizi sürekli destekledi.

—— Suzhou Huike Technology Co., Ltd.

Keda olarak, Shaanxi Kegu Yeni Malzeme Teknolojisi A.Ş. ile uzun süredir devam eden ortaklığımızı büyük bir memnuniyetle karşılıyoruz. Yüksek kaliteli SSiC seramik çözümleri projelerimizin ayrılmaz bir parçası olmuştur ve devam eden işbirliğimiz ve ortak başarımız için sabırsızlanıyoruz.

—— Keda Endüstri Grubu A.Ş.

Ben sohbet şimdi

Case Study: Why a Chemical Processing Plant Switched from RB-SiC to SSiC

March 23, 2026
son şirket davası hakkında Case Study: Why a Chemical Processing Plant Switched from RB-SiC to SSiC

Background

A chemical processing facility operating in an acidic environment was using components made from Reaction Bonded Silicon Carbide (RB-SiC) for pump seals and corrosion-resistant structural parts. The system was exposed to concentrated sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) at elevated temperatures around 100°C.

After several months of operation, the plant observed gradual performance degradation, including surface erosion and dimensional changes in certain RB-SiC components.

To improve service life and operational stability, the engineering team evaluated Pressureless Sintered Silicon Carbide (SSiC) as an alternative material.


Problem Identified

Material analysis showed that the RB-SiC components contained approximately 10–15% free silicon phase. In strong acid environments, this free silicon can undergo selective corrosion.

As a result, the material structure gradually weakens, leading to:

  • Surface corrosion
  • Reduced mechanical strength
  • Increased maintenance frequency
  • Shorter component lifetime

Testing data under sulfuric acid conditions showed a significant difference in corrosion rate:

  • SSiC: 1.8 mg/cm²·yr
  • RB-SiC: 55.0 mg/cm²·yr

This difference became critical in long-term continuous operation.


Solution: Switching to SSiC Components

The facility replaced several RB-SiC parts with SSiC components manufactured with high densification control.

Key material characteristics included:

  • Density ≥ 3.05 g/cm³
  • Near-zero open porosity
  • No free silicon phase
  • Flexural strength ≥ 380 MPa
  • High-temperature strength ≥ 420 MPa at 1300°C

Because SSiC is produced through high-temperature pressureless sintering (>2100°C), the resulting microstructure is more chemically stable in aggressive environments.


Results After Implementation

After switching to SSiC components, the plant observed several improvements:

  • Improved corrosion resistance
    The absence of free silicon significantly reduced acid attack.
  • Longer service life
    Component replacement intervals increased noticeably.
  • More stable operation
    Dimensional stability under thermal and chemical stress improved.
  • Reduced maintenance downtime
    Lower corrosion rates led to fewer shutdowns for part replacement.



Engineering Insight

The key difference between the two materials lies in the presence of free silicon.

  • RB-SiC contains residual silicon formed during reaction infiltration.
  • SSiC forms a fully sintered SiC structure without a secondary silicon phase.

In strongly corrosive environments, especially acids, the silicon phase in RB-SiC becomes the weak point of the material.

This makes SSiC a more suitable choice for:

  • Chemical processing equipment
  • Corrosion-resistant pump components
  • High-temperature acid environments


Takeaway

When selecting between SSiC and Reaction Bonded SiC, the operating environment plays a critical role.

For applications involving:

  • High temperature (>1200°C)
  • Strong acids or corrosive chemicals
  • Long-term structural stability requirements


SSiC typically provides better long-term performance.

RB-SiC remains a viable solution for applications where cost efficiency is a priority and the operating environment is less aggressive.




İletişim bilgileri
Shaanxi KeGu New Material Technology Co., Ltd

İlgili kişi: Ms. Yuki

Tel: 8615517781293

Sorgunuzu doğrudan bize gönderin (0 / 3000)